home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In <Norman-040495155618@red_knight.msfc.nasa.gov>
- Norman@eisner.decus.org (Richard) writes:
-
- >
- >In article <fusionD6C5HC.A9q@netcom.com>, fusion@netcom.com (Fusion
- Films)
- >wrote:
-
- The past:
- >Anybody know why PC magazine failed to include DPS's products in their
- >review of digital video products? Hell most of the ones they reviewed
- >didn't have NTSC output! S-video IN was required, but no output, go
- figure.
- >Besides I thought the TBC IV had S-video IN?
- >
- >I suggest some of us send in the above info to 157.9301@Mcimail.com
- >which is PC magazine's email address.
- >Attention of Jeff Mace who was the project leader on the story
- >or Lance Ulanoff the associate editor in charge of the story.
- >"Digital Video Shot by Shot" in the April 11, 1995 issue.
- >
- >It was a pretty good article, but I hate it when they leave stuff out.
- > Richard Norman
-
- The present:
-
- Richard,
- The idea of the article was using video for multimedia, hence
- the MPEG, AVI, MOV only stance. The PAR is a whole different thing for
- a whole different purpose. I don't think people would be happy if they
- came home with the newest game from the store and couldn't play it
- because they didn't have a PAR.
-
- -=Fred=-
-
-
-
-